Forte Tax & Law » Labor law
When a company is liquidated, the employer is obligated to pay the dismissed employees their average monthly earnings for the period during which they are looking for a new job. However, in practice, it is often the case that the right to such payment does not arise until after the completion of the liquidation process.
Several years ago, the Russian Constitutional Court highlighted this issue, and amendments were even introduced to the Russian Labor Code. Yet the core problem remains: by the time the right to payment arises, the legal entity will have ceased to exist. As a result, the employee—or, in some cases, the prosecutor’s office—will file a lawsuit to recover the unpaid amounts, and courts will typically rule in their favor.
This creates potential liabilities for the company, the liquidator, and the founders. To avoid such situations, it would be advisable to make provisions for possible payments already in the liquidation phase.
To read the full article, click here (in Russian).
Read MoreThe Russian Constitutional Court heard a case[1] of an employee who had been dismissed from his principal place of work due to redundancy. The employer paid the employee a severance allowance, but refused to pay the employee’s average monthly earnings for the period of finding a new job [2]. The employer believed that the employee was a dual job holder and, therefore, such an employee was not entitled to a guarantee in the form of payment of his average monthly earnings. The courts sided with the employer in a dispute with the employee.
However, the Russian Constitutional Court ruled that such a reading of the law was inconsistent with the Constitution. Upon dismissal from the principal place of work, an employee loses part of the total labor income (which may be significant). This leads to the need to find a new job. Moreover, dismissal from the principal place of work does not transform a dual job employment contract into a principal one. Therefore, taking into account these factors, it is impossible to deprive dual job holders of guarantees in the form of payment of average monthly earnings for the period of finding a new job.
Thus, the Russian Constitutional Court held that the failure to pay average monthly earnings to a dual job holder upon dismissal from the principal place of work due to liquidation or downsizing/redundancy is contrary to the Constitution. This means that the employer is obligated to pay such an employee average monthly earnings for the period of finding a new job, even if the employee has another paid job with another employer.
What are the implications of this ruling for employers and employees?
First, until changes are made to applicable Russian laws, the employer will be obligated to follow the position of the Russian Constitutional Court. Second, an employee may apply to the employer asking for the payment of the employee’s average monthly earnings, if such earnings have not been paid. And the employer will be obligated to pay them. Third, there is a high risk that valid decisions on similar disputes between employees and employers will be overturned. These are decisions that contradict the position of the Russian Constitutional Court.
The Forte Tax & Law team will be pleased to advise you on labor law issues and the resolution of labor disputes.
If you have any questions or you would like to discuss something, please send an email to Julia Talagaeva or Ekaterina Beliaeva.
[1] Ruling No. 54-П of the Russian Constitutional Court dated November 22, 2024 In the case of the verification of the constitutionality of parts two and three of Article 318 of the Russian Labor Code in connection with the complaint filed by citizen V. V. Sergeev. [2] Average monthly earnings can be paid for up to six months. Read MoreWe would like to inform you that the draft law increasing fines for employers for failure to perform military registration duties has been adopted in the form that we discussed in our previous alert and will take effect October 1, 2023.
Read MoreThe Russian State Duma is now considering amendments to the Russian Code of Administrative Offenses. The amendments provide for a significant increase in the fines for failure to perform the military registration duties.
Read MoreLast Tuesday, July 12, the St. Petersburg International Business Association (SPIBA) hosted an event titled “Employment Relationship in Times of Uncertainty—Relocation, Dismissals, and Changes to Employment Agreements”.
Read MoreMika told members of the FRCC about the options that companies might use today to adjust the cost of labor in Russia.
Read MoreNumerous legislative changes usually enter into force at the beginning of the year, and 2022 was no exception. We have outlined in this review the main changes in the regulations that will become effective in 2022.
Read MoreThe Russian legislation regulating electronic document management (EDM) is being changed and improved to better serve labor relations.
Read MoreOn October 12, 2021, St. Petersburg Chief State Sanitary Doctor adopted Order which affects a significant number of entities operating in St. Petersburg.
Read MoreLast week, pravo.ru published an article on the hot topic of compulsory vaccination which has already been introduced in several regions. Julia Talagaeva commented to pravo.ru on how employers should announce vaccination within specific timeframes.
Read More